Prior to adios, I was always running in trainers>15 oz or so. I ran 2012 Boston in Mizuno enigma which were pretty heavy! I was laughed at after the marathon when my friends found out. These shoes were awesome trainers (no doubt I never got injured in my training), but not racing shoes.
Having gained more experience after my second marathon, I decided to play with shoes. I bought asics racing flats for my track workouts and 5K-10K races. They were good. I did not train in them for long. Although my coach wanted me to go minimal by training in shoes that had less toe-heel drop. The asics were too low to be a training shoe.
end of August I was done with most of short distance races and in September I was beginning to train for a fall half-marathon. On Sep 1, I bought my first adios. I have owned 3 pairs since then. They are all Red. So... I was told that these are great half-marathon to marathon racing shoes. Many people have also trained in them. I looked up online reviews and a friend of mine had also worn these a few years ago. But another model! Which we both realised very recently and much late, as the damage was done
I started training for half in them. I had a pretty good half (1:26) wearing those. I gave them the credit.
Soon after, my left hamstring issue started getting more and more obvious. All that time, I never thought of replacing the shoe. really Dumb! I was too confident that it wasn't the shoe that was causing it. Well, together with other asymmetries, I am sure there was something that the shoes add to it as well.
I started training for Boston on Dec 1 and all the time during the training I was never once an absolutely injury free person. I was not injured but there were underlying issues. I was testing my leg, the pull on the connecting tissue, stretching the muscle and all those little tweaks that a runner does sub-consciously at all times.
By the end of March, with maximum mileage, my lower leg issues begin to get exposed. There were times I would think of wearing the old mizuno for a run but I was too afraid to make any change. I bought the final adios for the marathon and any run done in those felt better than the one's in the older adidas. The old shoes had miles on them but not enough for them to be acting up on me.
After all that post-marathon pondering as to what went wrong, and some discussion with Mark (who recently tried these shoes and gave up), we have a sort of hypothesis as to what went wrong.
Adios are great for racing but not training. They are light and do not offer much cushioning or stability. yes, I am a neutral runner and they are meant for neutral runners but you can wear these shoes once or twice a week and last them for a long time rather than for longer miles.
I was almost saved from having a stress fracture.
Again, this is only my hypothesis. Who knows what went wrong.
Having gained more experience after my second marathon, I decided to play with shoes. I bought asics racing flats for my track workouts and 5K-10K races. They were good. I did not train in them for long. Although my coach wanted me to go minimal by training in shoes that had less toe-heel drop. The asics were too low to be a training shoe.
end of August I was done with most of short distance races and in September I was beginning to train for a fall half-marathon. On Sep 1, I bought my first adios. I have owned 3 pairs since then. They are all Red. So... I was told that these are great half-marathon to marathon racing shoes. Many people have also trained in them. I looked up online reviews and a friend of mine had also worn these a few years ago. But another model! Which we both realised very recently and much late, as the damage was done
I started training for half in them. I had a pretty good half (1:26) wearing those. I gave them the credit.
Soon after, my left hamstring issue started getting more and more obvious. All that time, I never thought of replacing the shoe. really Dumb! I was too confident that it wasn't the shoe that was causing it. Well, together with other asymmetries, I am sure there was something that the shoes add to it as well.
I started training for Boston on Dec 1 and all the time during the training I was never once an absolutely injury free person. I was not injured but there were underlying issues. I was testing my leg, the pull on the connecting tissue, stretching the muscle and all those little tweaks that a runner does sub-consciously at all times.
By the end of March, with maximum mileage, my lower leg issues begin to get exposed. There were times I would think of wearing the old mizuno for a run but I was too afraid to make any change. I bought the final adios for the marathon and any run done in those felt better than the one's in the older adidas. The old shoes had miles on them but not enough for them to be acting up on me.
After all that post-marathon pondering as to what went wrong, and some discussion with Mark (who recently tried these shoes and gave up), we have a sort of hypothesis as to what went wrong.
Adios are great for racing but not training. They are light and do not offer much cushioning or stability. yes, I am a neutral runner and they are meant for neutral runners but you can wear these shoes once or twice a week and last them for a long time rather than for longer miles.
I was almost saved from having a stress fracture.
Again, this is only my hypothesis. Who knows what went wrong.



